The High Court of Nyarugenge on Monday, May 4, 2026, heard an appeal case involving journalist Uzabakiriho Cyprien, popularly known as Djihad, and three co-accused over charges linked to the distribution of pornographic content involving musician Yampano.
Djihad, alongside Ishimwe François Xavier and Kwizera Nestor, appeared in court dressed in prison uniforms, while Kalisa John attended proceedings while out on bail.
The four are appealing a three-year prison sentence previously handed down in connection with offences related to the dissemination of obscene material through computer systems or networks.
The prosecution told the court that the accused face two charges: distributing and making publicly available pornographic content using digital platforms.
Djihad denied the charges but made a plea for leniency, apologising and asking the court either to acquit him or suspend his sentence.
Ishimwe François Xavier also denied the allegations. However, the prosecution cited a cybercrime report indicating that he was involved in distributing and commercialising the explicit material, including evidence of payments linked to the content.
Kwizera Nestor requested a suspended sentence, telling the court that time spent in detention had reformed him and that he was ready to contribute positively to society if released.
Kalisa John admitted to receiving the images but denied sharing them further. He also challenged earlier witness testimony, claiming one witness later apologised, saying he had been mistaken.
His defence lawyer asked the court to acquit him and return seized items, arguing that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain a conviction.
However, the prosecution maintained its position, urging the court to uphold the original ruling and find Kalisa John guilty of distributing obscene material and transmitting pornographic content through digital systems.
In his final submission, Djihad again requested a reduction or suspension of his sentence. The court, however, noted that sentence mitigation is typically considered in cases where an accused person pleads guilty, which was not the case throughout the proceedings.
The court closed the hearing and scheduled judgment for Tuesday, May 19, 2026.
