The genocide survivors’ organization IBUKA has welcomed a decision by the Paris Court of Appeal to reopen investigations into Agathe Habyarimana, who is suspected of involvement in the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi.
In a statement released on May 7, 2026, IBUKA described the ruling as a significant step toward justice for survivors more than three decades after the genocide.
“Crimes against humanity do not expire, and justice must be fully served,” the organization said.
IBUKA President Dr Philibert Gakwenzire said the decision marks an important milestone, stressing that the continuation of the investigation offers renewed hope for accountability.
“What matters now is that the investigation continues and justice delivers on its promise to survivors,” he said.
The organization alleges that Agathe Habyarimana played a role in the planning and execution of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, during which more than one million people were killed within approximately 100 days.
IBUKA also recalled that following the downing of President Juvénal Habyarimana’s plane on April 6, 1994, Tutsi residents living near the presidential residence were among the first to be killed.
Genocide survivor Marie Chantal Niyonshuti, who lived near the Habyarimana household, said her mother and seven siblings were killed during the early hours of the genocide, adding that she has spent more than 30 years waiting for justice.
“I have waited 32 years for justice. I am still waiting. Do not let this investigation stop again,” she said.
IBUKA urged French judicial authorities to expedite the proceedings and pursue other suspects residing in France who have not yet been brought to justice for their alleged roles in the genocide.
The organization also reaffirmed its readiness to cooperate with French authorities by providing testimonies and documentation to support the investigation.
The Paris Court of Appeal’s decision on May 6, 2026, allows the inquiry into Agathe Kanziga Habyarimana, widow of former President Juvénal Habyarimana, to proceed over alleged involvement in the genocide and its preparation.
The ruling follows an appeal against a previous decision that had dismissed the case due to insufficient evidence, effectively halting proceedings last year.
